Fiscal deficit of Jharkhand for 2024-25 is targeted at what percent of GSDP? (A) 3% (B) 2% (C) 4% (D) 5%

Points to Remember:

Jharkhand’s fiscal deficit target for 2024-25.
Understanding the concept of fiscal deficit and GSDP.
Identifying the correct percentage target from the given options.

Introduction:

The fiscal deficit is a crucial indicator of a state’s financial health. It represents the difference between a government’s total expenditure and its total revenue, excluding borrowings. A high fiscal deficit can indicate unsustainable spending practices, while a low deficit suggests fiscal prudence. The fiscal deficit is often expressed as a percentage of the Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP), providing a relative measure of the deficit’s size compared to the state’s overall economic output. This question requires identifying the targeted fiscal deficit of Jharkhand for the financial year 2024-25 as a percentage of its GSDP. The options provided are 3%, 2%, 4%, and 5%. This question requires a factual approach, relying on official government data or budget documents.

Body:

Finding the Correct Data:

To answer this question accurately, we need to consult the official budget documents released by the Jharkhand government for the financial year 2024-25. These documents, typically released before the start of the fiscal year, would explicitly state the targeted fiscal deficit as a percentage of the GSDP. Unfortunately, without access to these official documents, a definitive answer cannot be provided. The information is not readily available through general web searches.

Importance of Fiscal Deficit Targets:

Setting a fiscal deficit target is a critical aspect of fiscal policy. A lower fiscal deficit generally indicates better financial management and reduces the state’s reliance on borrowing. However, aiming for excessively low deficits can sometimes hinder necessary public spending on crucial sectors like education, healthcare, and infrastructure. The optimal fiscal deficit level depends on various factors, including the state’s economic growth rate, revenue generation capacity, and developmental priorities.

Consequences of High Fiscal Deficits:

High and persistent fiscal deficits can lead to several negative consequences, including:

Increased public debt: Continuous borrowing to finance deficits increases the state’s debt burden, potentially leading to debt distress.
Inflationary pressures: Increased government borrowing can put upward pressure on interest rates and contribute to inflation.
Crowding out private investment: Government borrowing can compete with private sector borrowing for funds, potentially reducing private investment and economic growth.
Reduced credit rating: High fiscal deficits can negatively impact a state’s credit rating, making it more expensive to borrow in the future.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, without access to the official budget documents of Jharkhand for 2024-25, it is impossible to definitively answer which percentage (3%, 2%, 4%, or 5%) represents the targeted fiscal deficit. The question highlights the importance of fiscal prudence and the need for states to carefully manage their finances to achieve sustainable economic growth. A balanced approach is crucial, ensuring that fiscal discipline doesn’t compromise essential public spending. Future research should focus on accessing the official budget documents to obtain the accurate figure and analyze the implications of the chosen fiscal deficit target for Jharkhand’s economic development. A transparent and publicly accessible budget process is essential for good governance and accountability.

JPSC Notes brings Prelims and Mains programs for JPSC Prelims and JPSC Mains Exam preparation. Various Programs initiated by JPSC Notes are as follows:-

For any doubt, Just leave us a Chat or Fill us a querry––